We include this editable document in the Proposal Kit Professional. Order and download it for $199. Follow these steps to get started.
DOWNLOADABLE, ONE-TIME COST, NO SUBSCRIPTION FEES
What Our Clients SayI purchased this product in 2011 and have utilized a majority of the proposals in some form or fashion. I have always continued to update it from then on out. This software is well worth the initial investment. It has paid for itself and then some. I would recommend this for any business that needs quick access to proposal templates."
1. Get Proposal Kit Professional that includes this business document.
We include this Sample User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Schedule in an editable format that you can customize for your needs.
2. Download and install after ordering.
Once you have ordered and downloaded your Proposal Kit Professional, you will have all the content you need to get started with your project management.
3. Customize the project template with your information.
You can customize the project document as much as you need. You can also use the included Wizard software to automate name/address data merging.

BrightHarbor Outfitters, a regional retailer led by project manager Maya Chen, faced scattered content, strict brand rules, and a looming launch date, yet their teams lacked a cohesive UAT test plan that tied acceptance criteria, test scenarios, and pass/fail status to business objectives and entry/exit criteria for production release.
UAT lead Carlos Vega established governance, stakeholder roles, and a production-like UAT test environment, mapping user stories to test cases and a findings log, while Proposal Kit supported the effort by creating the executive proposal, training plan, and risk summary using document creation and the AI Writer (for those extra documents, not the UAT schedule itself), plus the RFP Analyzer to compare hosting bids and line-item quoting to price migration and testing services.
Over a three-week UAT timeline, testers executed given-when-then scripts against curated test data, tracked defects to exit criteria thresholds, and held daily triage; Proposal Kit assembled a client-ready UAT test summary report and a communications plan that clarified change management, while the RFP Analyzer evidence strengthened vendor selection decisions.
With high-priority issues closed, entry and exit criteria met, and a clean summary report for executives, BrightHarbor achieved UAT sign-off on schedule, reduced post-release incidents, and used Proposal Kit's line-item quoting to secure funding for a phased content migration without budget overruns.
At Veridian Clinical, UAT sponsor Dr. Lena Ortiz needed sponsor approval for a patient-facing eCOA module that had to meet regulatory acceptance testing and data integrity expectations while preserving requirements traceability to the study protocol and requirements document.
Business analyst Raj Patel organized UAT stages across development and test environments with clear acceptance criteria, defect severity thresholds, and usability checks, and Proposal Kit produced the supporting documentation set-study protocol addendum, validation plan, training materials, and stakeholder briefings-using document creation and the AI Writer for those auxiliary documents, while line-item quoting clarified device provisioning costs and the RFP Analyzer evaluated a localization vendor.
Testers executed role-based test cases for site staff and participants, logged issues with evidence, and reviewed visualization charts of coverage and pass rate; Proposal Kit assembled a polished acceptance report and a regulator-ready narrative, ensuring the project management UAT documents were complemented, not authored, by the extra reports and plans.
UAT exit criteria were met with documented post conditions, data reconciled, and help desk readiness confirmed, leading to formal sponsor approval and a controlled production release that kept the study on timeline without protocol deviations.
Fintech startup NimbusPay, guided by CTO Jonah Reed, prepared a high-volume payout feature that demanded a risk-based UAT approach for scalability, data flow, and reconciliation across partner bank integrations, yet stakeholders lacked a concise acceptance testing narrative they could share with the bank's due diligence team.
UAT coordinator Olivia Park defined acceptance criteria per user role, prioritized high-risk flows, and set exit conditions by severity and coverage, while Proposal Kit created the supplemental materials-a partner readiness brief, a performance test highlights report, and an operational handover plan-using document creation and the AI Writer for these extra artifacts, plus the RFP Analyzer to answer the bank's questionnaire and line-item quoting to price pilot support.
NimbusPay ran end-to-end scripts in a production-like environment, tracked defects and retests, and presented results with clear visualization dashboards; in parallel, Proposal Kit assembled a customer-facing proposal and concise UAT synopsis that mirrored the underlying schedule without altering it.
The bank approved onboarding after seeing traceable results, defined exit criteria, and a crisp readiness pack, and NimbusPay launched with fewer incidents, faster customer adoption, and a reusable library of supporting documents maintained in Proposal Kit for future releases.
This Content Management UAT Schedule establishes how a content management solution will be validated and verified before production release. A well-structured user acceptance test aligns the software with business requirements, the system requirements specification, and user stories, ensuring business goals and user satisfaction are met. The schedule typically defines UAT scope and stages, supported by a UAT governance framework that clarifies UAT roles and responsibilities, stakeholder roles, and a responsibilities matrix for the UAT team of end users, business analysts, quality assurance (QA), and project managers.
The schedule guides UAT planning and test management through a UAT test plan, UAT test cases, and test situations. It calls for UAT scripts that use clear given when then statements, with test steps, expected result versus actual result, and pass fail status. It also outlines test data preparation, UAT test data controls, and checks for data integrity, scalability, and UAT usability and UI UX concerns.
UAT entry criteria and exit criteria (with an entry checklist and exit conditions) ensure readiness, while preconditions and postconditions document the state of the system. The UAT environment should mirror a production-like environment, distinct from the development and test environments, across hosting environments and integrated or provisioned devices; BYOD can be addressed where relevant.
Execution topics often include a UAT kick-off, a defined UAT timeline (for example, a UAT timeline of two-week sprints), UAT training for UAT testers trained on procedures, and a risk-based approach with UAT risk mitigation plans. A UAT defects and findings process uses a UAT findings log, UAT defect log, UAT defect severity, and severity priority, plus UAT feedback collection through a UAT feedback form. Teams may use a UAT Jira template, a UAT Trello example, a UAT Excel template, a Word template, and a PDF template with a consistent UAT case template and UAT test script.
UAT documentation includes a UAT test summary, a UAT summary report, a UAT acceptance report, and a UAT report for governance. The UAT sign-off process finalizes acceptance thresholds with the UAT sign-off document, the UAT acceptance form, the UAT acceptance signatures, the UAT sign-off approval, the UAT debrief, and the UAT closeout to confirm production readiness.
Use cases include launching a new CMS, migrating legacy content, introducing workflow approvals, or meeting regulatory acceptance testing requirements where content is participant-facing. Organizations may also perform business acceptance testing, operational acceptance testing, contract acceptance testing, and address regulatory expectations.
Proposal Kit can streamline this work with document assembly, an extensive UAT template library (plan templates, case templates, and UAT templates and examples), an AI Writer to build supporting documents, and automated line-item quoting for related proposal services, helping teams produce consistent, easy-to-use UAT documentation.
Additionally, a robust acceptance approach ties UAT to the software development lifecycle with clear acceptance criteria, a UAT checklist, and a UAT scenario template that maps directly to business objectives and user roles. Well-defined UAT stages and UAT entry and exit criteria set UAT entry conditions, UAT preconditions, and UAT exit conditions. Validation and verification occur across a UAT development environment, a UAT test environment, and a UAT production-like environment that mirrors the UAT production environment before production release. A UAT governance process clarifies UAT responsibilities, UAT stakeholder roles, a UAT responsibilities matrix, and the role of the UAT sponsor.
Effective planning blends a UAT high-level plan with a detailed UAT plan and a UAT documentation plan. Test management includes UAT test planning, UAT test case procedure, UAT execution, and UAT test results analysis. Teams confirm UAT data integrity, UAT scalability, UAT data flow, and UAT end-to-end validation while watching for UAT usability concerns.
Requirements traceability back to the requirements document and, where applicable, a study protocol supports regulated contexts, such as UAT clinical studies using an eCOA system with participant-facing components and ePRO consortium guidance, meeting UAT regulatory expectations. Acceptance testing types can include alpha testing and beta testing. UAT issues are captured through UAT bug reporting and UAT bug tracking in a UAT bug reporting tool, with visualization tools, UAT findings categories, UAT defect severity, and UAT severity priority. Teams may coordinate work through a UAT tool and templates such as a UAT GitHub template, UAT GitLab template, UAT Asana template, UAT ClickUp template, UAT Monday template, UAT Teamwork template, or UAT Wrike template.
Closure requires a UAT acceptance testing checklist, a UAT entry checklist, UAT acceptance thresholds, UAT sign-off signatures, and UAT sign-off approval. Strong governance and risk mitigation address UAT challenges and UAT mistakes, document UAT documentation retention, and prepare change management for UAT production readiness. Programs with varied UAT hosting environments, BYOD studies, or integrated devices often centralize communications in a UAT portal and distribute artifacts using a UAT Word template, a UAT PDF template, or a UAT email template.
Proposal Kit helps teams assemble a consistent UAT plan template, acceptance criteria examples, scenario templates, and a UAT test summary report quickly. Its document assembly, AI Writer for supporting documents, and extensive template library streamline governance artifacts and sign-off forms, while automated line-item quoting supports the related proposal effort.
To deepen the schedule's usefulness, define measurable UAT exit criteria that tie directly to UAT business objectives and UAT requirements traceability. Include UAT acceptance criteria examples mapped to UAT user roles, so each role knows what done looks like. UAT best practices add decision gates with defect thresholds, test coverage targets, and evidence requirements, plus UAT post conditions such as data reconciled, access controls configured, and support readiness confirmed before any UAT production release.
Strengthen visibility with UAT visualization tools that show coverage by requirement, pass/fail trends, defect aging, and residual risk. Apply a UAT risk-based approach to prioritize high-impact workflows, integrations, and data flows, and align fixes with UAT change management so requirement updates, test re-runs, and impacts are controlled. Formal UAT sponsor approval closes the loop once objectives, criteria, and evidence are satisfied.
Clarify people and handoffs. A trained UAT tester executes UAT acceptance testing examples step-by-step, while UAT business analysts curate criteria, maintain traceability, and confirm that results support business value. Use role-based dashboards to track progress by UAT user roles and confirm that each role's situations meet expectations. As a final governance check, summarize metrics in a concise report: criteria coverage, pass rate, outstanding risks, and readiness to confirm UAT exit criteria are met, highlight lessons learned, and provide a clear recommendation for or against release.
4.7 stars, based on 849 reviews
Ian Lauder has been helping businesses write their proposals and contracts for two decades. Ian is the owner and founder of Proposal Kit, one of the original sources of business proposal and contract software products started in 1997.
Published by Proposal Kit, Inc.We include a library of documents you can use based on your needs. All projects are different and have different needs and goals. Pick the documents from our collection, such as the Sample User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Schedule, and use them as needed for your project.