We include this editable document in the Proposal Kit Professional. Order and download it for $199. Follow these steps to get started.
DOWNLOADABLE, ONE-TIME COST, NO SUBSCRIPTION FEES
What Our Clients SayI have used Proposal Kit Professional since 2009. It is definitely a time-saver. Also, once I started using the software, the templates brought to my attention proposal items that I overlooked in my original self-drafted proposals. I have used it for web design proposals as well as photography proposals."
1. Get Proposal Kit Professional that includes this business document.
We include this Software Testing Plan in an editable format that you can customize for your needs.
2. Download and install after ordering.
Once you have ordered and downloaded your Proposal Kit Professional, you will have all the content you need to get started with your project management.
3. Customize the project template with your information.
You can customize the project document as much as you need. You can also use the included Wizard software to automate name/address data merging.

Maya Chen at Aurora Ledger, a mid-market fintech, had a solid internal test plan but struggled to secure bank partner approval because stakeholders wanted clear risk narratives, budget transparency, and a mapping from regulatory RFP clauses to test coverage before greenlighting a high-visibility release.
Using Proposal Kit for document creation, Maya's team built supporting materials around the existing plan: a governance brief, a risk assessment, and a customer-facing test summary; the AI Writer drafted an executive briefing and UAT readiness study, while the RFP Analyzer extracted regulatory obligations from the bank's RFP and aligned them to traceable test artifacts, with line-item quoting producing a defensible cost and effort model.
The core project management and testing templates remained authored by QA leads, while Proposal Kit generated companion documents in days: an obligations-to-test-case matrix from the RFP Analyzer, a stakeholder alignment memo and pilot rollout plan via AI Writer, and a granular pricing appendix via line-item quoting that detailed environments, test data seeding, and regression cycles.
Aurora Ledger won partner approval, cut weeks from deliberations, and launched on schedule with transparent budgets and auditable traceability, reducing change requests and accelerating time to market for the pilot program.
Dr. Evan Price at BrightWave Health faced a risky EHR migration where conversion testing and recovery procedures had to withstand external audit, but the team lacked polished reports, stakeholder communications, and a clear effort estimate that payers would accept.
They kept their internal project management documents intact and used Proposal Kit's document creation tools to assemble a data migration study, an installation and rollback report, and a test completion report; AI Writer produced an appendix on environment readiness and a clinician-facing usability test brief, while line-item quoting modeled phased environments and test runs, and the RFP Analyzer parsed payer checklists into compliance mappings.
Proposal Kit outputs were routed through review gates and tied to existing test artifacts, with the AI Writer accelerating drafts for nontechnical audiences and the RFP Analyzer creating a coverage index that auditors could navigate alongside the plan, all without altering the original testing templates.
Auditors approved the evidence pack on first pass, stakeholders understood the scope and residual risk, and BrightWave migrated on time with fewer defects discovered post-go-live and a clear trail of compliance documentation.
Luis Ortega at Northstar Civic Tech bid on the City of Riverview's portal rebuild, where community oversight required a meticulous story around testing readiness, budget, and rollout sequencing beyond the internal PM artifacts.
Northstar used Proposal Kit to craft a persuasive proposal, a phased implementation plan, and a risk-and-issues brief that complemented their existing project management documents; AI Writer produced citizen training guides and an accessibility testing overview, the RFP Analyzer decomposed the city's RFP into obligations linked to test evidence, and line-item quoting generated transparent pricing for environments, test data, and manual and automated cycles.
The team preserved their internal templates while Proposal Kit assembled public-facing narratives, created an obligations matrix for council review via the RFP Analyzer, and produced outreach summaries and status report shells with AI Writer to support ongoing governance.
Northstar won the contract, established trust with a clear compliance and budgeting trail, and delivered an on-time beta with fewer change orders thanks to aligned expectations and well-structured supporting documents.
This document is a structured software test plan template that guides a QA team from purpose and scope through approval and archiving. It lays out key topics of a test plan, including test plan content, test plan structure, resources and responsibilities, milestones, test schedule, and schedule timelines. It ties tests back to the Software Requirements Specification and other references to support traceability and stakeholder alignment. Teams can adapt it as a master test plan or a specific test plan, and even condense it into a one-page test plan for an agile test plan.
The testing strategy section prompts analytical test strategies, risk-based testing, and clear entry and exit criteria. It distinguishes features to be tested and not tested to define the release scope and test coverage. Success criteria, exit criteria examples, and pass/fail rules reduce common mistakes in test planning. Roles and responsibilities, test logistics, and effort estimation help plan test environment setup, hardware and software configurations, and browser compatibility.
The approach spans component, integration, conversion, interface, recovery, performance, regression, and acceptance activities, plus alpha, beta, and RC phases. It supports manual and automated testing, test case design, test case priority, and test situations, with a test case repository for each test run. Security testing and usability testing can be added within the same structure. The plan encourages the use of a test management tool, test scripts, and error logs, and it anticipates bug triage and test plan review cycles.
Deliverables include a test summary report, test completion report, UAT report, installation report, and test reports and analytics that track defect density, defect detection efficiency, and time to market. A risks and issues log, plus risk assessment, risk mitigation, and contingency plans, strengthens risk management. Change request handling and test plan update procedures keep the plan current. Many teams also mirror this test plan template on the Confluence page for visibility.
Use cases include a SaaS release that needs browser compatibility and performance baselines, a healthcare data migration requiring conversion testing, an e-commerce platform focused on security testing and regression, and an internal operations app validating operator procedures and job stream behavior.
This structure aligns with the Proposal Kit's strengths. Document assembly and an extensive template library speed plan creation; automated line-item quoting supports effort and cost estimation; and the AI Writer can generate supporting sections and related documents. These templates improve consistency and ease of use across your QA workflow.
Expanding on the business impact, a robust test plan also improves governance and predictability. Assigning a unique test plan ID links all artifacts, from test cases to reports, ensuring clear traceability through approvals and audits. An upfront definition of resources and roles aligns the QA team, developers, and product owners so that handoffs are smooth and accountability is explicit.
Entry criteria formalize readiness (code branch, environments, data, and tooling) so teams avoid wasteful starts, while schedule and estimation convert scope into realistic sprints and milestones the business can trust. Embedding best practices-peer reviews, risk-based prioritization, and clear pass/fail thresholds-reduces rework and raises confidence in release decisions.
Proposal Kit helps organizations operationalize this discipline. Teams can assemble a test plan sample quickly, adapt it to project specifics, and maintain consistency across portfolios. The template library and document assembly streamline test plan best practices, while automated line-item quoting assists with budget and effort estimation for phases and environments.
The AI Writer can write supporting documents, such as environment definitions, stakeholder matrices, or change control write-ups, so managers spend more time on analysis and less on formatting. Whether a startup is preparing its first audit or an enterprise is standardizing across programs, these capabilities accelerate planning, improve alignment, and keep quality efforts on schedule and within budget.
Further strengthening the plan, teams should plan test environment activities early. Define how to plan test environment provisioning, including network access, test data, and hardware and software configurations across dev, QA, and staging. Document browser compatibility targets and any mobile device matrices as part of test logistics. A unique test plan ID ties environments, builds, and each test run to the correct test case repository and test management tool, improving test reports and analytics and making bug triage faster.
Governance improves when leaders schedule formal test plan review checkpoints tied to the test schedule and milestones. Use a lightweight master test plan for program standards and a specific test plan per release to keep scope focused. Apply test plan best practices such as linking test case priority to risk-based testing and entry criteria, and drive exit criteria decisions with test summary report metrics like defect density and defect detection efficiency.
A test completion report should explain what was tested, residual risk, and success criteria; a UAT report confirms stakeholder alignment; an installation report verifies deployability in production. Common mistakes in test planning include unstable test environment setup, vague roles and responsibilities, weak traceability, and unclear success criteria-each avoidable with analytical test strategies and periodic test plan update cycles.
Proposal Kit accelerates this operating rhythm. Teams can start from a test plan sample, adapt sections to resources and responsibilities, and assemble companion documents in minutes. Template benefits include consistent test plan content, schedule, and estimation support via automated line-item quoting, and AI Writer assistance for writing appendices, risk assessment and mitigation notes, and change-control narratives- all practical aids that help keep quality efforts on time and improve time to market.
Software Testing Plan (STP)
Insert the purpose of this document, its objectives, and its intended audience. Insert description of the scope of this Software Testing Plan. Insert constraints, such as schedules, costs, interactions, overview, or any other information relevant to the testing of the development requirements. Insert an overview or brief description of the product, software, or other desired end result that is being tested under this Software Testing Plan.
Insert an overview of the business or organization desiring the development of this project. Include the business or organization's mission statement and its organizational goals and objectives. Note: If you have already completed a Software Requirements Specification, the majority of this material is copied verbatim from that document.
The purpose of this preamble is to familiarize staff recently attached to the testing portion of a project who may not have been present or involved with earlier stages of the project.
Testing Strategy
Insert a general overview of the strategy and plan for meeting the testing deliverables. Describe the levels of testing that will need to take place and the type of testing activities. A more detailed outline will be provided further on in this document. If there are specific tests that need to follow their own STP, you can describe them in an additional document, separate from this main document.
A Testing Strategy Outline will include:
The individual items to be tested. The purpose for testing those items. The individual features to be tested.
The individual features NOT to be tested. The managerial and technical approach to testing. The criteria for pass & failure of testing. The individual roles or responsibilities of participants in testing.
The milestones and deliverables required for testing. The schedules and timelines for individual tests or the Software Testing Plan as a whole. The risk assumptions and constraints placed upon the Software Testing Plan.
References & Reference Material
Insert a list of all reference documents and other materials related to the Software Testing Plan.
References will often include, but are not limited to:
Documentation Items
Insert references to documentation, including but not limited to:
Items to be Tested
1 Program Modules
Insert a description of the testing to be performed for each module that the software contains.
2 Job Control Procedures
Insert a description of the procedures to be followed for testing the job control language (JCL), including scheduling for production, control and all job sequencing. This section should include all the relationships between the above-mentioned items in the Program Modules section.
3 User Procedures
Insert a description of the testing to be conducted on user documentation and support resources (online or printed) to ensure that they are complete and comprehensive.
4 Operator Procedures
Insert a description of the testing procedures to be conducted to ensure that the software can be run and supported within a production environment as intended, and that any Help Desk or other support services outlined in the plan can be verified as effective and meeting the intended support outcomes as outlined in the goal of the Software Testing Plan.
5 Features to be Tested
Insert the objectives and requirements for features that are being tested in this Software Testing Plan.
6 Features Not to be Tested
Insert the objectives and requirements for features that are NOT being tested in this Software Testing Plan.
Approach
Insert the objectives and requirements for the overall approach to testing. The approach should cover such major tasks as the identification of time estimates for each element of the Software Testing Plan. Identify the different types of testing and describe their testing methods and the criteria for evaluating such testing.
Your Software Testing Plan may contain several different approaches for certain elements.
1 Component Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements to verify the implementation, integrity, and functionality for a single unit, component, module, or a group of individual software elements or components. Component Testing is performed to verify that the individual component or group of components is complete and functioning as intended.
2 Integration Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements to verify the implementation, integrity and functionality for combined units, such as individual software units, components, or a group of individual software elements or components that has been combined with hardware elements. Integration testing is important to ensure that the software is functional as a whole within the environment it is intended to run. The Integration Testing is performed to ensure that all operational requirements are met.
3 Conversion Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that all historical data elements convert or are compatible with the new system. Conversion testing is required only if the software is an upgrade of an older system or will use or manipulate data from other systems.
4 Job Stream Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that the software operates correctly in the production environment.
5 Interface Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that the software operates correctly with all user interface and input systems.
6 Recovery Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that the software’s recovery and restore operations function correctly and all backup systems and procedures work as intended in the production environment.
7 Performance Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that the software operates correctly in regards to normal operation, response and execution times, scalability, portability and all other performance requirements within the production environment.
8 Regression Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that any changes applied to the software do not affect functions previously tested.
9 Acceptance Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that the software or system meets all criteria and deliverables. The Acceptance Testing is important to ensure that all requirements are met and that all components, modules, hardware requirements and recovery and restore operations function in the production environment and that a plan exists to demonstrate such functionality for a customer or client.
10 Alpha, Beta, and Release Candidate (RC) Testing
Insert the objectives and requirements for testing that will be done by a customer or client to verify that the software meets all deliverables and requirements from the Software Requirements Specifications (SRS) or the Software Development Plan (SDP) and to detect any errors, bugs, or defects in the software.
Pass and Failure Criteria
This section describes the criteria to determine whether a specific item has passed or failed a particular test.
1 Criteria for Suspension
This section will describe the criteria for suspending an individual element or group of elements for a particular testing activity.
2 Criteria for Resumption of Testing
This section will describe the criteria for resuming testing for an individual element or group of elements that has been previously suspended.
3 Criteria for Approval of Testing
This section will describe the criteria for acceptance and approval for an individual element or group of elements.
Testing Process and Methods
Insert the specific testing process and methods to be used in performing each testing activity. In this section you will describe and define each type of test that the Software Testing Plan contains. You may attach additional exhibits to this section if your testing plan requires them.
Test Deliverables
Insert the specific deliverables and documents that are to be delivered from the testing process. Test deliverables may include incremental data or data derived from incomplete tests.
Typical test deliverables include, but are not limited to:
Test Incident Reports
Testing Task & Requirements List. A description of tasks and the skills required for performing testing as a part of the deliverables. A description of the hardware and environmental requirements for performing testing as a part of the deliverables. Focus on restraints such as resource availability, time constraints, staff and developer availability, and all other external factors that can influence testing.
Risk and Assumption Contingency Plan(s)
Insert a description of the contingency plan for each item listed above.
Change Request and Management
A description of the Software Testing Plan change request and change management procedure. Describe the process that must be followed for submission, review and authorization for all requests for change to the Software Testing Plan or any change to any part of the deliverables.
Approval for Software Testing Plan
A description of the personnel authorized to approve the Software Testing Plan. Their Name, Title and signature must accompany this document.
Appendices
A description of all other supporting information required for the understanding and execution of the Software Testing plan and requirements.
All Software Testing Plan documents require the following two appendices:
Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations
A description of the definition of important terms, abbreviations and acronyms. This may also include a Glossary of terms.
References
A listing of all citations to all documents and meetings referenced or used in the preparation of this Software Testing Plan and testing requirements document.
4.7 stars, based on 849 reviews
Ian Lauder has been helping businesses write their proposals and contracts for two decades. Ian is the owner and founder of Proposal Kit, one of the original sources of business proposal and contract software products started in 1997.
Published by Proposal Kit, Inc.We include a library of documents you can use based on your needs. All projects are different and have different needs and goals. Pick the documents from our collection, such as the Software Testing Plan, and use them as needed for your project.